• AQTESOLV Home
  • Tour
  • Solutions
  • Cooley and Case (1973)

Cooley and Case Solution for Leaky Confined Aquifers

  • Assumptions
  • Equations
  • Data requirements
  • Solution options
  • Estimated parameters
  • Curve matching tips
  • References

Related Solution Methods

  • Hantush (1960)
  • Moench (1985)
  • Neuman (1974)

Additional Topics

  • Full list of solution methods
  • Pumping test analysis
Well-aquifer configuration for Cooley and Case (1973) pumping test solution for a leaky confined aquifer with a water-table aquitard

A mathematical solution by Cooley and Case (1973) is useful for determining the hydraulic properties (transmissivity, storativity and leakage parameters) of a leaky confined aquifer with a water-table aquitard. Analysis involves matching the Cooley and Case solution to drawdown data collected during a constant- or variable-rate pumping test.

You are not restricted to constant-rate tests with the Cooley and Case solution. AQTESOLV incorporates the principle of superposition in time to simulate variable-rate and recovery tests with this method.

Assumptions

  • aquifer has infinite areal extent
  • aquifer is homogeneous, isotropic and of uniform thickness
  • potentiometric surface is initially horizontal
  • aquifer is confined
  • flow is unsteady
  • wells are fully penetrating
  • water is released instantaneously from storage with decline of hydraulic head
  • diameter of control well is very small so that storage in the well can be neglected
  • confining bed has infinite areal extent, uniform vertical hydraulic conductivity, storage coefficient, specific yield and thickness
  • flow is vertical in the aquitard

Equations

Cooley and Case (1973) derived a solution for unsteady flow to a fully penetrating well in a homogeneous, isotropic leaky confined aquifer overlain by a water-table aquitard. The Laplace transform solution is as follows:

s ¯ D = 2 K 0 x p     (1) x = p + q ¯ D     (2) q ¯ D = 4 p β coth 4 p β r / B 2 + p sech 2 4 p β r / B 2 × p L / b ′ r / B 2 + r / B 2 16 β 2 S ′ S y + p 4 β tanh 4 p β r / B 2 -1     (3) B = T b ′ + L K ′     (3) β = r 4 K ′ S ′ b ′ T S     (5) t D = T t S r 2     (6) s D = 4 π T Q s     (7)

where

  • b′ is thickness of aquitard [L]
  • K′ is vertical hydraulic conductivity of aquitard [L/T]
  • K0 is modified Bessel function of second kind, order zero
  • L is height of capillary fringe [L]
  • p is Laplace transform variable
  • Q is pumping rate [L³/T]
  • r is radial distance from pumping well to observation well [L]
  • s is drawdown [L]
  • S is storativity [dimensionless]
  • S′ is storativity of aquitard [dimensionless]
  • Sy is specific yield of aquitard [dimensionless]
  • t is elapsed time since start of pumping [T]
  • T is transmissivity [L²/T]

Data Requirements

  • pumping and observation well locations
  • pumping rate(s)
  • observation well measurements (time and displacement)

Solution Options

  • constant or variable pumping rate with recovery
  • multiple pumping wells
  • multiple observation wells
  • boundaries

Estimated Parameters

  • T (transmissivity)
  • S (storativity)
  • r/B (leakage parameter)
  • β (leakage parameter)
  • S′/Sy (storage ratio in aquitard)
  • L/b′ (dimensionless height of capillary fringe)

The Report view shows aquitard properties, K′/b′ and K′, computed from the leakage parameter, r/B.

Curve Matching Tips

  • Use the Cooper and Jacob (1946) solution to obtain preliminary estimates of aquifer properties.
  • Choose Match>Visual to perform visual curve matching using the procedure for type curve solutions.
  • Use active type curves for more effective visual matching with variable-rate pumping tests.
  • Select values of r/B and β from the Family and Curve drop-down lists on the toolbar.
  • Use parameter tweaking to perform visual curve matching and sensitivity analysis.
  • Perform visual curve matching prior to automatic estimation to obtain reasonable starting values for the aquifer properties.

References

Cooley, R.L. and C.M. Case, 1973. Effect of a water table aquitard on drawdown in an underlying pumped aquifer, Water Resources Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 434-447.